How to Hire Senior Technical Talent When Inbound Fails

How to Hire Senior Technical Talent When Inbound Fails
How Zach Waterfield - an ex-YC Founder - Built his technical teams with precision 

If you’ve ever:

  • Spent months trying to hire a critical role
  • Thought you knew what you wanted in an ideal candidate - only to meet them and realize… maybe you don’t know what you’re looking for (now what?!)
  • Been flooded with unqualified inbound candidates
  • Or simply felt like the right people just aren’t out there

Well, you’re not alone.

We sat down with Zach Waterfield - an ex-YC Founder who’s led hiring across venture-backed startups and funds - and asked him about his approach.

Spoiler: He’s worked with 10-12 different search firms in his career and Artemis is the only one he’d work with again. And he means it: He’s brought us in to help him build teams at three different organizations… and referred us to countless others.

We covered:

👉 When does it make sense to work with an external search firm, and when should you go at it solo?
👉 What doesn’t work, and how can you avoid those common pitfalls?
👉 What to do when the role itself is unclear (and how that’s more common than you think!)
👉 Green and red flags in finding the right search firm… and the right candidates.
👉 What most companies get wrong with technical recruiting.

Whether you’re a founder or CEO hiring a technical team, a VC or PE operator hiring internally or for portfolio companies, or a C-suite or VP leader responsible for your organization’s next critical hire… buckle up. We have 3 organizations’ worth of learnings to share with you.

Hiring Across Three Distinct Environments

Zach worked with Artemis across three different hiring scenarios:

1. High-Growth Startup (On Deck)
  • ~150 → 300 employees in ~18 months
  • Rapid scaling across functions
  • Persistent gap in technical talent pipeline
2. Venture Capital Fund (Pioneer Fund)
  • ~7 employees
  • First technical hire: Head of Platform Engineering
  • Had spent months trying to find the right person before reaching out to Artemis
  • Without any technical leadership, their no-code tools were starting to break. The fund had hundreds of millions under management and without this leader - and without working tools - “the business was actually being limited,” Zach shared. 
3. Early-Stage Startup (Rove)
  • ~30 employees
  • ~5 engineers → scaling team
  • Needed senior technical talent with specific domain expertise (e.g., AI systems, infrastructure)
Traditional hiring wasn’t delivering quality candidates

In all three scenarios, Zach and his team tried finding the right talent himself first. In doing that, he found:

1. Inbound generates volume, not necessarily quality: 

Posting the job led to high applicant volume, but low relevance to his dream candidate: “You get a lot of people that just don’t fit what you’re looking for.”

2. The candidates he was hoping for weren’t actively looking or applying for jobs:

But the catch: He didn’t realize this until he engaged with Artemis to run the search: “One of the things that Ashley [Sr. Executive Recruitment Consultant at Artemis] does well is almost everyone I've interviewed with is not actively looking. She's really good at finding people that are [currently working] in a job that is probably very relevant to what we're looking for, and she's able to convince them to come in and try to take a look. Sometimes, those people are not even looking at all.”

3. For highly specialized, mission-critical roles… outbound candidate outreach is needed. But not everyone likes doing it (or has the time to!):

In the same way we tell sales leaders: Outbound sales is a skill. So is outbound recruitment. As Zach says, “It was very obvious that we couldn’t get the inbound talent we needed. So we needed someone to focus on outbound outreach. 

But personally, I do not enjoy outbound. I prefer running the interview process once the candidates have come in and been pre-vetted.”

4. The role wasn’t fully defined:

At Artemis, we often work with early-stage startups or companies at an inflection phase of their growth. In hiring terms, this means roles can be ambiguously defined. 

Founders & hiring leaders know the outcomes they want, but may not have a concrete sense of the right role and scope to get them there. 

Zach had a similar experience: “It happened every time we worked with Artemis… she [Ashley, Sr. Executive Recruitment Consultant] always came in and talked to all the stakeholders and understood [our needs] from different perspectives. 

It helped shape the role. 

I think one thing companies are really bad at is shaping their roles. They don’t actually know what they want until they see what they don’t want, and then they’re able to iterate through.”

With the help of a search partner, true requirements can emerge through (1) All stakeholders being asked the right questions as a forced reflection function, and (2) Candidate exposure.

5. Hiring Gaps Became Business Constraints:

Pioneer Fund was managing “hundreds of millions” under assets but didn’t have an engineering leader to build out their tech. 

After spending months trying to find a Head of Platform Engineering on his own, Zach realized, “the fund was actually being limited by not having this person.”

A reframe: You don’t have a hiring problem, you have a definition + access problem.  

You might be stuck in a chicken-or-egg situation. 

You think you know what you’re looking for in an ideal candidate, but you need to actually meet with candidates to know for sure. 

But what if your job postings aren’t attracting the right talent? 

Unless you have a stellar employer brand (which you can learn about here!) you likely need to supplement with outbound, dedicated search efforts.

But of course: Ideally, you avoid the feedback & iteration loop in the first place. 

Instead: By asking yourself and all stakeholders the right questions and getting timely market insights, you can save time by knowing exactly what you’re looking for.

The Artemis Approach: 
Deep Business & Stakeholder Alignment

Instead of starting with just a job description, Artemis:

  • Interviewed multiple stakeholders
  • Built a multi-dimensional understanding of:
    • Role expectations
    • Business needs
    • Technical requirements

When we asked Zach, he said: “Artemis took the time to understand our business. Ashley [Sr Executive Recruitment Consultant] talked to pretty much every stakeholder in the company, which was like 6 or 7 people to understand [the role] from all the different angles.” 

Then, Artemis shared a “fruit basket” of candidates. In other words, they shared a variety of candidate profiles with Zach to get his feedback. By iterating on the ideal candidate profile up front, the search refined rapidly and Zach was already much closer to knowing his dream candidate profile before interviews even started. 

“She [Ashley] sent me a link to your CRM where she had candidates shortlisted, and I went through and said yes or no. It helped her hone in on the types of people and backgrounds.”

The Business Impact

We asked Zach: After Artemis helped you find your new hires, what changed for you personally?

He said: “It was nice to have the extra bandwidth on the team - that’s a big one. 

The other thing that becomes obvious after you get the right candidate is that the fees are worth it. 

During the process, it can seem like it’s a big cost because generally - especially at seed stage companies - you’re not spending that [money] on anything. 

But ultimately, if you get the right person in the door, then it was worth it.”

What Most Companies Get Wrong About Recruiting

We asked Zach what he sees other startups get wrong about recruiting. He says…

Mistake 1: Treating Inbound as a Complete Strategy

“It was very obvious that we couldn’t get the inbound talent we needed. We needed someone to focus on outbound outreach.”

Mistake 2: Using multiple search firms at once

“You’ll see companies in YC bring on 3 search firms and run them in parallel. They don’t get the value from them because they’re not working close enough with a single one and they’re comparing them… 

It just runs into a lot of issues.”

Mistake 3: Not finding the right search firm

“Make sure you get a good referral to a good search firm. I’ve worked with maybe 10 or 12 [search firms] and Artemis is the only one I’d work with again.”

Mistake 3: Not investing in role definition

“One of the things that companies are really bad at is shaping their roles. They don’t know what they want until they see what they don’t want.”

Mistake 4: Overlooking technical talent with humanities backgrounds

“So this is an interesting one. The best 3 engineers I’ve ever worked with had English degrees, not engineering degrees… I definitely don’t filter out people who are coming from a social sciences or psychology background because they think about things differently. They bring a lot of interesting perspectives.

Mistake 5: Relying too much on technical interviews

“You can get more out of a candidate from an engineering perspective in situational discussions than deep technical interviews. Those deep technical interviews - especially with how AI is going - are becoming less and less important. It’s more about how they think about product and implementation rather than understanding the bits under the hood.”

We hope that hearing Zach’s story - from 3 different organizational perspectives - is helpful. 

Next time you feel like you’re spinning your recruitment wheels and not getting the needle-in-a-haystack talent you’re looking for, remember that you’re not alone. 

Matchmaking is tough, especially when the stakes are so high. [The parallels between recruiting and dating never cease to amaze us].

And of course, we’re happy to chat to share our insights, advice, and explore if a potential partnership could help you land the dream candidate. 

Until next time,

  • Negin & The Artemis Team
Negin Safdari
Negin Safdari

April 22, 2026